The Stanford Prison Experiment

Audience Reviews

View More

Jace E @thefilmguy May 19 It's crazy that this actually happened and it's even crazier that Dr. Zimbardo experienced zero repercussions. Looking at the film itself, it's decent. The cast is full of super interesting actors whose names I can't remember. There are multiple uncomfortable moments that made me cringe, specifically related to the John Wayne character. My biggest complaint is that we didn't have a "main" character to follow inside the experiment. 8612 is the focal point for a minute, but that doesn't last long. I know it's based on a true story, but I didn't feel like I got a satisfying. resolution. Best Character: 2093 Best Quote: "It's easy for you to say, 'Oh, I wouldn't have acted that way', but you don't know. That's - that's the truth. You don't know. And now I know what I'm capable of, and it hurts." - Karl Best Scene: Entering the prison Best Piece of Score: "Remembering the Experiment" Watch Filtered on VidAngel See more Jack F @MovieFan111 Nov 17 Dang. This was a crazy movie. But I think the craziest thing about it was particularly one of the actors who played a guard. If you're familiar with the campy Disney movie Princess Protection Program, then you know Ed. I could not believe Ed was in this movie, but it's sooo funny that he is!!!! See more Alexa K @aksss512 Oct 2 In the past few years, Zimbardo has been debunked as a FRAUD. Making this entire film A LIE!!! There are many documentaries and papers discussing how he lied about the parameters of the experiment completely. The study has a ton of archives that prove this. He gave the guards instructions on how to instill fear and make the prisoners feel powerless. He even had a SCHEDULE on what kind of hazing they should do each day and progressively get more intense!!!!! The guards thought they were hired actors, even putting on accents and getting into character. They thought the experiment was to showcase how awful prison is. The prisoners were angry at Zimbardo (not the guards) because they were only being paid minimum wage, and they were being hazed in a locked basement, and they and didn't see any value in staying. Zimbardo refused to let them leave when they asked, unless they could exhibit physical or psychiatric illness. So they got ANGRY a professor locked them in a basement! And they acted out so they could be let go! It wasn't a mental breakdown of being in a "prisoner role" and forgetting reality. And Zimbardo / his grad students even pulled guards to the side and told them they aren't being aggressive enough with the prisoners or taking an active role. Which COMPLETELY negates his assertion that these people had no instructions and just randomly became "sadistic" when given a bit of power with zero input. What insane lies he told!! Every participant, guard and prisoner, said Zimbardo lied about the parameters and results, and is a fraud. But Zimbardo was so talented in getting himself in the media and talk shows, this became one of the most famous experiments in modern psychology. And it's a stunning failure of acadamia that it took 50 years for people to finally look at the evidence and realize it was ONE BIG LIE. See more Ola G @Ollie1972 04/05/2025 Stanford University psychology professor Philip Zimbardo (Billy Crudup) conducts a psychological experiment to investigate the hypothesis that roles in social situations, rather than individual personality traits, cause participants' behavior. In the experiment, Zimbardo selects eighteen male students to participate in a 14-day prison simulation to take roles as prisoners or guards. They receive $15 per day. The experiment is conducted in a mock prison located in the basement of Jordan Hall, the university's psychology department building. The students who are guards become abusive, as does Zimbardo himself, as they immerse themselves in their assigned roles... Upon its premiere at the 2015 Sundance Film Festival, The Stanford Prison Experiment received a positive response from critics. Rotten Tomatoes consensus states: "As chillingly thought-provoking as it is absorbing and well-acted, The Stanford Prison Experiment offers historical drama that packs a timelessly relevant punch." Leslie Felperin of The Hollywood Reporter gave the film a positive review, writing: "For all its flaws it's a rich, thought-provoking film which, while challenging, is not without humor and visual pleasures." Jordan Hoffman of The Guardian gave the film four out of five stars and judged that "Director Kyle Patrick Alvarez deserves all the praise in the world for the way he cranks up this pressure cooker script." Edward Douglas in his review for ComingSoon praised the film, remarking: "While this is going to be a polarizing and divisive film, it's one that people will talk about after seeing it, almost as if it was made as an experiment itself." However, Justin Chang of Variety criticized the film, saying "The combination of relentless forward drive and gruesomely fastidious detail, while audacious and admirable in theory, begins to pay dwindling returns in a picture that feels rather longer than its 122-minute running time." (Via Wikipedia) The plot concerns the real 1971 Stanford prison experiment, conducted at Stanford University under the supervision of psychology professor Philip Zimbardo, in which students played the role of either a prisoner or correctional officer. Looking at the it must have been clear already then that this was by far a truly controversial psychological experiment and it did end after just six days. The real storyline sets up a thought provoking film that has some intense scenes, but it also suffers from a mixed bag of performances with a bit too many fake wigs and moustaches that doesn´t convince you that it's 1971. This is yet another film based on real events and you never know what liberties Hollywood has taken with the story which I always my critique with these sort of films. "The Stanford Prison Experiment" is ok, but I rather see a proper documentary over this psychological experiment. See more Apple S @RT27050751 08/19/2024 Good film. I was familiar with the experiment, and I think this movie does a good job of capturing the strange psychological feeling of wrongness that seemed to occur. The way the participants adopted their roles so quickly, and how everyone fell into this weird hypnotic new norm, including the experimenters, to the point that they lost themselves and couldn't see that it had gone too far. It's a very challening movie to watch. It makes you wonder and question what you might do in that situation. It's scary and profound and I think everybody should watch this film and familiarise themselves with the experiment. It teaches us a lot about human nature. I also liked how the filmmakers didn't let the experimenters off the hook either. They're dragged into the charade too and you can see how they were culpable and guilty of letting it go on too long too. I'll bump my 3.5 up to a 4, given how profound the subject matter it, but there was something left wanting with this film. Questions that weren't quite answered. Scenes that went on too long. I'm not sure. Not a 5 star movie, but definitely worth watching. See more Sharon T @sharonkeely 02/12/2024 The movie never once mentioned how this study has been severely criticized for being both unethical and unscientific. It is BECAUSE of this study that stricter regulations were put into place with human subjects experimentation. See more Read all reviews

The Stanford Prison Experiment

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING